Comments on: ‘Back From Vacation’ deleted scenes

By: Adriana

Adriana — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:04:38 +0000

In the deleted scenes, the camera crew films Jan telling one of her coworkers in New York about her trip to Scotsdale over Christmas. She doesn’t work for the Scranton branch and nobody from the Scranton branch was there, but she was still being filmed. In the context of the show, the crew must just record people of interest who are related to the Scranton branch, even the Scranton folks aren’t present.

By: Big Tuna

Big Tuna — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:53:03 +0000

I noticed that too Toni. I guess the continuity is why they deleted that scene.

By: Cousin Mose

Cousin Mose — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:19:34 +0000

Makes you wonder what the final “Office” project is supposed to be in the context of the TV show. Is it supposed to be a feature length film? A miniseries? A PBS special?

By: Angie

Angie — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:48:40 +0000

Jim’s a Scranton guy, so they followed him, I’m sure in TV world they all have camera’s followeing them to work events.. like Jim’s house party, or the booze cruise. I dont know. I just think if they taped at other places, we’d see more of it. It’d be a whole dunder mifflin thing, rather than a dunder mifflin scranton thing, which it is.

By: Bold Guy (Agus Lucas)

Bold Guy (Agus Lucas) — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:17:32 +0000

I don’t think so, Angie. They follow Michael all day (like in Halloween episode), but how can they got the image of Jim asking for the transfer if he went to talk to Jan in the morning? They didn’t get Michael cooking his foot in the morning. They never say anithing about it, so we never know.
(Sorry for my english, again)

By: Toni

Toni — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:29:56 +0000

In the fifth scene, did anyone notice that Michael drove by a building that said “Dayton Rogers of California” on it? Scranton…California…it’s all the same, I guess!

By: joseph

joseph — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:02:50 +0000

so with all these deleted scenes already being released online will there be anything new other then commentaries on the DVD release?

By: JimHalpertIsLife

JimHalpertIsLife — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:27:28 +0000

hahahahha.. as soons as i read “michaeltakes a chill pill” i thought it couldnt have ONLY been meant for chilling.

By: Angie

Angie — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:17:01 +0000

Correction, they film Jan because of her new relationship with Michael. But that’s the only instance of it.

By: Angie

Angie — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:15:32 +0000

They do all of that stuff because it’s in the contract to follow all of the Dunder Mifflin Scranton people. Someone from Scranton is always in the scenes. It’s not like the are filming NY when Michael isn’t there. Jim was followed to Stamford because he’s from Scranton. Plus I’m sure they wanted to tag along with him because of the “P” situation. Also Jim is awesome.

By: D.

D. — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:05:18 +0000

There’s a fifth scene up now.

By: Bold Guy (Agus Lucas)

Bold Guy (Agus Lucas) — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:43:24 +0000

The third scene make me think about a theory I have. I believe that the documentary film all the Dunder Mifflin branches, and not only Scranton. That explains why the documentary ‘followed’ Jim to Scranton, why they captured him asking for the ARM job in Stamford to Jan and why they film the NY office. What do you think?

By: Samantha

Samantha — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:52:38 +0000

Did anyone notice that when the boxes fell the red cup was showing but when it went back to that shot, it was gone.

By: Melody

Melody — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:08:45 +0000

I find it so frustrating that all of Meredith’s scenes get cut! MORE MEREDITH!

By: Jamaica_Sun_Princess

Jamaica_Sun_Princess — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:53:30 +0000

Why do they cut this stuff? it’s just too good!

By: Word.

Word. — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:36:12 +0000

poor meridith!

By: lano

lano — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:08:33 +0000

Aaaaaaand now there’s a 4th deleted scene up :)

By: Laura

Laura — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:14:24 +0000

this settles it…we officially need more meredith talking heads

By: rachel (2)

rachel (2) — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:05:37 +0000

Question: last week Jan spilled her guts in front of the camera, so why is she now telling the camera/doc crew she was “in Scottsdale”??

By: rachel (2)

rachel (2) — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:02:39 +0000

Hey, Neil (post 18)- $50 Jamaican for a postcard. Shocker.
You could be the next John Sutherland!