Jenna in Wired Magazine
Thursday, March 22nd, 2007peopleareshapes over at the LiveJournal Office has posted scans of the latest issue of Wired Magazine, including some eye-catching graphics of Jenna Fischer and the article, “What We Can Learn from The Office.”
Link: Jenna Fischer in Wired Magazine
Update: Read what the Wired blog says about the cover —
Michael Elins photographed her in Los Angeles in a dingy little studio. And yes, the whole thing is real; we shot it in two parts, Jenna in her business suit and her birthday suit (really). She was a great sport about the whole thing. Funny and endearing.
Or is this just an April Fool’s joke? Hmmm.
Hiya. I’m actually interning at the magazine right now, and while I wasn’t at the shoot or anything, I did hear the Creative Director talk about it. As I remember, they shot her first naked, and then had her put on the business suit and spent a lot of time getting her to align her body just so, so that the clear acetone overlay would match up exactly. It’s the real deal Holyfield, folks, though I couldn’t speak to whether/how much the photo was Photoshopped.
I think you’ll dig the article inside the mag as well, some funny quotes from Michael and Jan.
57 | Jake Sat. Mar. 24, 2007 at 6:44pmWell, it’s clear from James T.’s linked photo (#59) that she didn’t whip off ALL her clothing.
56 | NSpector Sat. Mar. 24, 2007 at 12:57amWow, I read her blog on how to make it in Hollywood and I didn’t see the part where it was necessary to whip your clothes off for some geeky magazine. Or do you only do that after you made it in Hollywood? Sorry, I’m in the group that thinks this is sans taste or class.
55 | Janet Fri. Mar. 23, 2007 at 7:38pmDwigt wrote:
> she needs to let her hair down.. she looks amazing with
> it down
I know! She’s so pretty, but, ugh, it looks lousy pulled across the forehead like that.
54 | John Fri. Mar. 23, 2007 at 5:34pmI dunno, I still don’t think that that’s Jenna’s body under there. It doesn’t look natural. If you compare this pic to the one she did for Jane, you can tell the difference.
53 | Office-O-Holic Fri. Mar. 23, 2007 at 1:21pmtanster: Thanks for finding that information. I believe it.
Jenn: Yes, definitely appears to be the way he does these kind of photos.
52 | NSpector Fri. Mar. 23, 2007 at 12:00pmJenna is so beautiful. Even dressed down and plain on the show she’s pretty, but’s she’s like a whole other person when she’s herself, in makeup and trendy clothes, hair done and she’s on talk shows or in mag interviews or something. John looks the same off and on the show, so does BJ, Steve, Paul, Mindy, etc. But Jenna and Rainn look so hot and sexy off the set. Rainn is quite fetching!! Hubba-hubba!!
51 | Employer of the Bride Fri. Mar. 23, 2007 at 8:53amOh wow this photographer has done some great stuff.
50 | God Fri. Mar. 23, 2007 at 7:29amI don’t get it, but ok.
Regarding the “plastic” quality of the photos. It looks to be the photographers style.
http://www.michaelelins.com/
49 | Jenn Fri. Mar. 23, 2007 at 5:37amSome information about the cover.
Or is this an April Fool’s joke? Hmmm.
48 | tanster Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 10:55pmshe needs to let her hair down.. she looks amazing with it down
47 | Dwigt Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 10:05pmWaa waa wee waa!
46 | Browncoat Jedi Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 7:21pmOK. After much Google Images research (hard at work in the trenches here), I’m revising my statement above. I now think it’s entirely possible that that IS Jenna Fischer from the neck down, albeit with some over-zealous photoshopping. Also, without getting too graphic about it, it appears that whoever’s body it is, she may not be entirely naked under there, i.e., she appears to be wearing some type of “lifting” garment, unless that impression as well is digitally manipulated.
45 | NSpector Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 6:50pmI only have one word….wow!
44 | iHaveA_Dundie Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 6:46pmhub huvb hubabbabbabababababba
*drool*
43 | morese Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 6:45pmPlease excuse me…I am now off to get the latest issue of this ‘Wired’ magazine!
42 | Marcus Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 4:50pmMan, Rashida Jones likes “sexy nerds” and Jenna Fischer’s in a geeky mag.
Yes, friends, our time has come!
41 | phyllis*farm Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 4:04pmI personally don’t like the pictures because her face is so badly photoshopped/airbrushed (nothing to do with her jacket). What’s so wrong with Jenna’s face that it has to be messed with so much?
I like the rest of the photos, hence, I am not a prude as someone tried to say.
40 | Christina Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 3:58pmYeah, seriously.
I would care way more about naked John Krasinski magazine covers.
please please please let some magazine editor read this request
39 | Megan Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 2:39pmCallan (#21) — Well, I’m no Jenna Fischer’s body expert, but, for starters, we do know something of what her arms look like from award shows and events, and the arms in these photos appear to be quite different.
38 | NSpector Thu. Mar. 22, 2007 at 2:26pm