<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Office: Conflict Resolution, 2.21</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution</link>
	<description>The Office Fansite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:03:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hootshot112</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-4#comment-475955</link>
		<dc:creator>hootshot112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-475955</guid>
		<description>god I love this picture!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>god I love this picture!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Den K</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-4#comment-309442</link>
		<dc:creator>Den K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-309442</guid>
		<description>no nickel prank :[</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no nickel prank :[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kearra</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-4#comment-302013</link>
		<dc:creator>Kearra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-302013</guid>
		<description>is there any actual show that shows the nickel prank?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there any actual show that shows the nickel prank?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-4#comment-2912</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-2912</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;d definitely get that picture in a poster print too! Its so hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d definitely get that picture in a poster print too! Its so hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanster</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-4#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>tanster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>Lena, I&#039;d like to know, too! (I&#039;ve requested this picture over in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.officetally.com/?p=343&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stuff to buy&lt;/a&gt; thread.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lena, I&#8217;d like to know, too! (I&#8217;ve requested this picture over in the <a href="http://www.officetally.com/?p=343" rel="nofollow">stuff to buy</a> thread.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-4#comment-2801</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-2801</guid>
		<description>Do you know where I can find a bigger picture of the photoshopped group pic? I love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know where I can find a bigger picture of the photoshopped group pic? I love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferd farkel</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>ferd farkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 17:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>ah, found it.

it seems i had lost my i/emotive voice there for a while, as well. turns out it had rolled under the couch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, found it.</p>
<p>it seems i had lost my i/emotive voice there for a while, as well. turns out it had rolled under the couch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferd farkel</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>ferd farkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 10:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>yes, and tanster you played toby perfectly. now....

just how does one aquire the suit their grandfather was buried in anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, and tanster you played toby perfectly. now&#8230;.</p>
<p>just how does one aquire the suit their grandfather was buried in anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Foolish Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>the Foolish Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 21:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>It was really all just an act...to demonstrate the theme of &quot;Conflict Resolution.&quot; Yep. That&#039;s what it was. 

Now if Tanster would be so kind as to open up the complaint file she keeps on all the members here, we can get all these little things resolved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was really all just an act&#8230;to demonstrate the theme of &#8220;Conflict Resolution.&#8221; Yep. That&#8217;s what it was. </p>
<p>Now if Tanster would be so kind as to open up the complaint file she keeps on all the members here, we can get all these little things resolved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanster</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>tanster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 21:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>Ferd Farkel and Foolish Sage, thank you for a thought-provoking discussion, and for concluding it as gentlemen and scholars.

I don&#039;t see a need to delete the comments. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ferd Farkel and Foolish Sage, thank you for a thought-provoking discussion, and for concluding it as gentlemen and scholars.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see a need to delete the comments. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Foolish Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>the Foolish Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 20:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>ferd wrote: &quot;i would be fine with tanster deleting the whole exchange. would you agree?&quot;

Whatever. If that seems best, fine. I usually am OK with letting my warts be on display, helps me grow. But if you think that would be more productive, I&#039;m good with it. I&#039;d be glad to rewrite and resubmit my thoughts in a less personally directed way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ferd wrote: &#8220;i would be fine with tanster deleting the whole exchange. would you agree?&#8221;</p>
<p>Whatever. If that seems best, fine. I usually am OK with letting my warts be on display, helps me grow. But if you think that would be more productive, I&#8217;m good with it. I&#8217;d be glad to rewrite and resubmit my thoughts in a less personally directed way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferd farkel</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>ferd farkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 18:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>i would be fine with tanster deleting the whole exchange. would you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would be fine with tanster deleting the whole exchange. would you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Foolish Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>the Foolish Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 17:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>I bow before Mr. Farkel...basic Internet etiquete that I know well but nonetheless forgot here. My apologies!

And beside, he trumped me forever by working in a win-win-win reference! Touche!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bow before Mr. Farkel&#8230;basic Internet etiquete that I know well but nonetheless forgot here. My apologies!</p>
<p>And beside, he trumped me forever by working in a win-win-win reference! Touche!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Foolish Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>the Foolish Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 11:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll ignore Fred&#039;s &quot;go get your own forum&quot; whine...because this is the Internet, so that goes with the territory.

Sorry I tried to bring a little depth to the discussion of what makes this show tick. Perhaps, Fred, you would be better off watching Gilmore Girls. &quot;Oh, when will Rory dump that nasty, nasty Logan?&quot;

Of course, in the real world, we would all love to see Pam and Jim live happily ever after. All I was saying is don&#039;t waste your time wishing for that to happen on this show, because it would ruin what the show is all about. 

We&#039;ve been through two seasons now. Has any character changed or grown in any significant way? Has anyone come to any self-realization through the situations that have happened? In standard comedies, the main character(s) always grow or change in some way. Take for example Northern Exposure, one of my favorites from the past. The starting premise of Joel&#039;s character was that he was a hard-nosed New Yorker who could never be at home in the Alaskan wilderness. Yet as time went by, Alaska (and the people of Cicely in particular) got to him. By the time the show ended, though he went back to NY, he went back as a true Alaskan.

I don&#039;t see anything similar ever happening on Office. It would break the rhythm of the show. This is not heartwarming comedy, and it is not meant to be. The only way anyone ever escapes the hell of the office is to get fired, so in a way the random guy who got downsized earlier this season was done an unknown mercy. Is that &quot;existential&quot;? Sure. But it&#039;s what makes the show funny. As I said before, the greatest comedies have all been based on the tragedy of life...which is why Office is among the greatest.

We now return you to our regularly scheduled Office Tally discussion: &quot;Do you think Dwight and Angela should go to Chilis on their first real date?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll ignore Fred&#8217;s &#8220;go get your own forum&#8221; whine&#8230;because this is the Internet, so that goes with the territory.</p>
<p>Sorry I tried to bring a little depth to the discussion of what makes this show tick. Perhaps, Fred, you would be better off watching Gilmore Girls. &#8220;Oh, when will Rory dump that nasty, nasty Logan?&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, in the real world, we would all love to see Pam and Jim live happily ever after. All I was saying is don&#8217;t waste your time wishing for that to happen on this show, because it would ruin what the show is all about. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been through two seasons now. Has any character changed or grown in any significant way? Has anyone come to any self-realization through the situations that have happened? In standard comedies, the main character(s) always grow or change in some way. Take for example Northern Exposure, one of my favorites from the past. The starting premise of Joel&#8217;s character was that he was a hard-nosed New Yorker who could never be at home in the Alaskan wilderness. Yet as time went by, Alaska (and the people of Cicely in particular) got to him. By the time the show ended, though he went back to NY, he went back as a true Alaskan.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anything similar ever happening on Office. It would break the rhythm of the show. This is not heartwarming comedy, and it is not meant to be. The only way anyone ever escapes the hell of the office is to get fired, so in a way the random guy who got downsized earlier this season was done an unknown mercy. Is that &#8220;existential&#8221;? Sure. But it&#8217;s what makes the show funny. As I said before, the greatest comedies have all been based on the tragedy of life&#8230;which is why Office is among the greatest.</p>
<p>We now return you to our regularly scheduled Office Tally discussion: &#8220;Do you think Dwight and Angela should go to Chilis on their first real date?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferd farkel</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>ferd farkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 11:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>your premise sounds a little slow. you may want to round that out with some character development, humor, add a love interest or two. you know, just to make it something people will want to come back for every week. 

your post suggests you see the show working on just one level. that’s fine because that is how you enjoy the show. but you seem to be criticizing others for enjoying the show as they see it. 

the writers arent sitting around moaning “why dont these idiots see my work for the existential masterpiece that it is.” they sit down and discuss and write and rewrite into the show every week the very things you are criticizing people for enjoying about it. blame them.

go get yourself a writers forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your premise sounds a little slow. you may want to round that out with some character development, humor, add a love interest or two. you know, just to make it something people will want to come back for every week. </p>
<p>your post suggests you see the show working on just one level. that’s fine because that is how you enjoy the show. but you seem to be criticizing others for enjoying the show as they see it. </p>
<p>the writers arent sitting around moaning “why dont these idiots see my work for the existential masterpiece that it is.” they sit down and discuss and write and rewrite into the show every week the very things you are criticizing people for enjoying about it. blame them.</p>
<p>go get yourself a writers forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Foolish Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>the Foolish Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>You disagree, Fred?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You disagree, Fred?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferd farkel</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>ferd farkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 23:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>speaking of trapped in your own private hell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of trapped in your own private hell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Foolish Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>the Foolish Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 00:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious as to why so many people treat this show like it&#039;s the Gilmore Girls. &quot;Oh, I hope Jim and Pam finally get together.&quot; &quot;Oh, Dwight shouldn&#039;t be so mean to Phyllis.&quot;

I understand the sentiments, but let&#039;s realize that the whole thing that makes this show work, it&#039;s whole comic premise, is that all of these people are hopelessly trapped in their own private hells...themselves. They never will change or grow. That&#039;s not what the show is about. The greatest comedies of all time have been based on human tragedy, and Office works so well because it is based on the greatest tragedy of all, being trapped with other human beings who, just like us, are hoplelessly destined to repeat their same sins over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious as to why so many people treat this show like it&#8217;s the Gilmore Girls. &#8220;Oh, I hope Jim and Pam finally get together.&#8221; &#8220;Oh, Dwight shouldn&#8217;t be so mean to Phyllis.&#8221;</p>
<p>I understand the sentiments, but let&#8217;s realize that the whole thing that makes this show work, it&#8217;s whole comic premise, is that all of these people are hopelessly trapped in their own private hells&#8230;themselves. They never will change or grow. That&#8217;s not what the show is about. The greatest comedies of all time have been based on human tragedy, and Office works so well because it is based on the greatest tragedy of all, being trapped with other human beings who, just like us, are hoplelessly destined to repeat their same sins over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 20:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>I just sat here and read through all the comments about last Thursday&#039;s show. I agree with just about everything I read. When Phyllis was getting her picture taken, I thought she looked really nice with her make-up. I forget what Dwight said to her, but he should not have said anything because it hurt her feelings. I really hope that Jim and Pam get together next week. How can we wait until next season? PLEASE don&#039;t make us wait until next season!!! Everyone in the show were great as usual. I love to see all of them. Creed turning sideways was really funny. I have trouble remembering all the names of everyone in the office, but love all of them. Waiting until Thursday night like everyone else.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just sat here and read through all the comments about last Thursday&#8217;s show. I agree with just about everything I read. When Phyllis was getting her picture taken, I thought she looked really nice with her make-up. I forget what Dwight said to her, but he should not have said anything because it hurt her feelings. I really hope that Jim and Pam get together next week. How can we wait until next season? PLEASE don&#8217;t make us wait until next season!!! Everyone in the show were great as usual. I love to see all of them. Creed turning sideways was really funny. I have trouble remembering all the names of everyone in the office, but love all of them. Waiting until Thursday night like everyone else&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.officetally.com/the-office-conflict-resolution/comment-page-3#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 10:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officetally.com/?p=232#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>I was amazed by this week&#039;s episode.  I&#039;m a huge fan of the BBC version and didn&#039;t think that the US one would be able to live up to the original, but now I can&#039;t decide which one I like more.  They&#039;re really two different shows now.  The character development this season has been unreal, culminating with this episode.  Granted, the BBC version was only planned out as 12 episodes.  I feel like the writers have much more freedom in this version and they&#039;re doing a great job with it.

Almost every single line in this episode was hilarious, but my favorite one wasn&#039;t.  It was just fantastic writing:

&quot;When people work together there is going to be conflict.  You can&#039;t outrun your problems.&quot; - &quot;Hi Pam, it&#039;s Jim.  Um, I have a doctor&#039;s appointment in the city...&quot;

I definitely don&#039;t think that Jim and Pam will be together when this season ends nor will she call off the wedding.  I do think Jim might transfer only to get reassigned to Scranton in the future due to the imminent downsizing.  Hopefully the cameras follow him wherever he goes.

p.s. - did anyone else catch the background conversation between michael and stanley during &quot;bobblehead joe&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was amazed by this week&#8217;s episode.  I&#8217;m a huge fan of the BBC version and didn&#8217;t think that the US one would be able to live up to the original, but now I can&#8217;t decide which one I like more.  They&#8217;re really two different shows now.  The character development this season has been unreal, culminating with this episode.  Granted, the BBC version was only planned out as 12 episodes.  I feel like the writers have much more freedom in this version and they&#8217;re doing a great job with it.</p>
<p>Almost every single line in this episode was hilarious, but my favorite one wasn&#8217;t.  It was just fantastic writing:</p>
<p>&#8220;When people work together there is going to be conflict.  You can&#8217;t outrun your problems.&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;Hi Pam, it&#8217;s Jim.  Um, I have a doctor&#8217;s appointment in the city&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I definitely don&#8217;t think that Jim and Pam will be together when this season ends nor will she call off the wedding.  I do think Jim might transfer only to get reassigned to Scranton in the future due to the imminent downsizing.  Hopefully the cameras follow him wherever he goes.</p>
<p>p.s. &#8211; did anyone else catch the background conversation between michael and stanley during &#8220;bobblehead joe&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
