In the deleted scenes, the camera crew films Jan telling one of her coworkers in New York about her trip to Scotsdale over Christmas. She doesn’t work for the Scranton branch and nobody from the Scranton branch was there, but she was still being filmed. In the context of the show, the crew must just record people of interest who are related to the Scranton branch, even the Scranton folks aren’t present.
Makes you wonder what the final “Office” project is supposed to be in the context of the TV show. Is it supposed to be a feature length film? A miniseries? A PBS special?
Jim’s a Scranton guy, so they followed him, I’m sure in TV world they all have camera’s followeing them to work events.. like Jim’s house party, or the booze cruise. I dont know. I just think if they taped at other places, we’d see more of it. It’d be a whole dunder mifflin thing, rather than a dunder mifflin scranton thing, which it is.
I don’t think so, Angie. They follow Michael all day (like in Halloween episode), but how can they got the image of Jim asking for the transfer if he went to talk to Jan in the morning? They didn’t get Michael cooking his foot in the morning. They never say anithing about it, so we never know.
(Sorry for my english, again)
In the fifth scene, did anyone notice that Michael drove by a building that said “Dayton Rogers of California” on it? Scranton…California…it’s all the same, I guess!
They do all of that stuff because it’s in the contract to follow all of the Dunder Mifflin Scranton people. Someone from Scranton is always in the scenes. It’s not like the are filming NY when Michael isn’t there. Jim was followed to Stamford because he’s from Scranton. Plus I’m sure they wanted to tag along with him because of the “P” situation. Also Jim is awesome.
The third scene make me think about a theory I have. I believe that the documentary film all the Dunder Mifflin branches, and not only Scranton. That explains why the documentary ‘followed’ Jim to Scranton, why they captured him asking for the ARM job in Stamford to Jan and why they film the NY office. What do you think?
In the deleted scenes, the camera crew films Jan telling one of her coworkers in New York about her trip to Scotsdale over Christmas. She doesn’t work for the Scranton branch and nobody from the Scranton branch was there, but she was still being filmed. In the context of the show, the crew must just record people of interest who are related to the Scranton branch, even the Scranton folks aren’t present.
I noticed that too Toni. I guess the continuity is why they deleted that scene.
Makes you wonder what the final “Office” project is supposed to be in the context of the TV show. Is it supposed to be a feature length film? A miniseries? A PBS special?
Jim’s a Scranton guy, so they followed him, I’m sure in TV world they all have camera’s followeing them to work events.. like Jim’s house party, or the booze cruise. I dont know. I just think if they taped at other places, we’d see more of it. It’d be a whole dunder mifflin thing, rather than a dunder mifflin scranton thing, which it is.
I don’t think so, Angie. They follow Michael all day (like in Halloween episode), but how can they got the image of Jim asking for the transfer if he went to talk to Jan in the morning? They didn’t get Michael cooking his foot in the morning. They never say anithing about it, so we never know.
(Sorry for my english, again)
In the fifth scene, did anyone notice that Michael drove by a building that said “Dayton Rogers of California” on it? Scranton…California…it’s all the same, I guess!
so with all these deleted scenes already being released online will there be anything new other then commentaries on the DVD release?
hahahahha.. as soons as i read “michaeltakes a chill pill” i thought it couldnt have ONLY been meant for chilling.
Correction, they film Jan because of her new relationship with Michael. But that’s the only instance of it.
They do all of that stuff because it’s in the contract to follow all of the Dunder Mifflin Scranton people. Someone from Scranton is always in the scenes. It’s not like the are filming NY when Michael isn’t there. Jim was followed to Stamford because he’s from Scranton. Plus I’m sure they wanted to tag along with him because of the “P” situation. Also Jim is awesome.
There’s a fifth scene up now.
D.
The third scene make me think about a theory I have. I believe that the documentary film all the Dunder Mifflin branches, and not only Scranton. That explains why the documentary ‘followed’ Jim to Scranton, why they captured him asking for the ARM job in Stamford to Jan and why they film the NY office. What do you think?
Did anyone notice that when the boxes fell the red cup was showing but when it went back to that shot, it was gone.
I find it so frustrating that all of Meredith’s scenes get cut! MORE MEREDITH!
Why do they cut this stuff? it’s just too good!
poor meridith!
Aaaaaaand now there’s a 4th deleted scene up :)
this settles it…we officially need more meredith talking heads
Question: last week Jan spilled her guts in front of the camera, so why is she now telling the camera/doc crew she was “in Scottsdale”??
Hey, Neil (post 18)- $50 Jamaican for a postcard. Shocker.
You could be the next John Sutherland!